Skip to main content

Organizations risking their corporate health

Nov 20 2007 by Brian Amble
Print This Article

Many corporate leaders are too focused on managing day-to-day crises to see that their organizations have serious underlying corporate health issues which could effect their long-term survival and competitiveness.

A new study co-sponsored by the Iacocca Institute of Lehigh University and SAS Institute's BetterManagement.com claims that nearly half of all organizations have serious corporate health issues, with more than half also suffering from employee retention difficulties.

While many respondents expressed overall optimism about near-term financial performance, almost half are concerned about some of their organizations' fundamental underpinnings.

These concerns centred particularly on their organization's strategy for the future as well as its ability to translate this strategy into action and execution - including leadership effectiveness and aligning the workforce.

"The study's results are a 'wake up call' to organization leaders regarding the importance of continual diagnosis and attention to core principles," said Robert A. Rudzki, whose corporate health assessment framework forms the basis of the study.

"In the current, dynamic business environment, it is easy to become consumed with daily emergencies and managing complexity. Senior leadership of organizations must set aside time to focus on periodic and comprehensive health checkups for their organizations and pay attention to core principles on an ongoing basis.

The study reveals that when it comes to gauging corporate health, some major disconnect exists between the views of the most senior-level executives and other levels of the organization.

For example, four out of 10 senior mangers rated their organizations' employee retention as either "fair" or "not good." But this proportion rose to more than six out of 10 for all other levels of respondents.

Poor employee morale is another widespread problem, with some four out of 10 respondents suggesting that morale of their top management was fair or not good and six out of 10 saying the same about the morale of their non-supervisory personnel.

"It is not a matter of choosing between the short term or the long term. Managing complexity and leading into the future both deserve attention and resources," Robert Rudzki added.

"Corporate executives and boards endanger their organization's long-term health by not paying continuous attention to the core principles of building and preserving corporate health."

Related Categories

Latest book reviews

MORE BOOK REVIEWS

Lead Like Julius Caesar

Lead Like Julius Caesar

Paul Vanderbroeck

What can Julius Caesar's imperfect story - his spectacular failures as well as his success - tell us about contemporary leadership challenges?

Relationship Currency

Relationship Currency

Ravi Rajani

In an era where AI can draft emails and manage our schedules, 'Relationship Currency' is a timely reminder of the importance of investing in genuine human connection.

Super Adaptability: How to Transcend in an Age of Overwhelm

Super Adaptability: How to Transcend in an Age of Overwhelm

Max McKeown

Max Mckeown's heavyweight new book draws from neuroscience, psychology and cultural evolution to develop a practical framework for human adaptability. It might also help you move from paralysis into abundance